Alex Eubank, often referred to as “The Greek God”, is a fitness enthusiast, social media star, and entrepreneur who has caught the attention of numerous people worldwide with his well-chiseled body.
Born on the 23rd of May in the year 2000, Eubank is 23 years old as of 2023. He maintains a powerful physique through a dedicated fitness regime, which is clearly displayed in his key stats.
Standing at 5 feet 9 inches and weighing 175 lbs, Eubank boasts an impressive body fat percentage of under 10%.
His measurements further emphasize his extraordinary physique – 16 inches on the arms, 14 inches on the calves, a 43-inch chest, 23-inch thighs, 37.5 inches on the hip, and a lean 27.9-inch waist. These numbers indeed put Alex Eubank in an elite league.
However, the question that remains is: How did he achieve this?
BULKING or CUTTING? We teamed up with the number one bodybuilding supplement brand on the market to help you take your results to the next level. A free custom supplement plan designed to enhance your results.
Naturally, or with the aid of substances such as steroids?
This article explores the controversy surrounding Eubank’s ‘natty’ status.
Can Eubank’s Physique be Achieved Naturally?
Alex Eubank’s physique is indeed a marvel to behold.
A physique such as his, maintained at 5 feet 9 inches and weighing 175 lbs with an impressive body fat percentage of under 10%, is not common.
His measurements further fuel questions, with 16-inch arms, a 43-inch chest, 23-inch thighs, and a lean 27.9-inch waist.
My Top Recommended Supplements
The main question is, can such a physique be achieved naturally, without any artificial enhancements or substances?
In the realm of fitness, it is not entirely impossible for a dedicated individual to achieve similar measurements naturally.
It requires rigorous training, strict dietary plans, and a high level of discipline. Genetic factors can also play a significant role.
Some individuals are naturally predisposed to pack on muscle more efficiently than others, often referred to as “genetic outliers.”
However, it’s essential to note the maintenance of such low body fat percentage while possessing such muscle mass.
This is where people start to question the “natty” status. It’s challenging to maintain muscle mass while being extremely lean, as the body tends to use muscle as a source of energy when in a caloric deficit, which is needed to lower body fat percentage.
In conclusion, while it is not entirely impossible to achieve Eubank’s physique naturally, it does raise eyebrows due to the difficulty of maintaining such a physique. It requires a level of dedication and genetic predisposition that is quite rare.
Alex’s Claims and Accusations
Alex Eubank has consistently maintained his stance on his natural status.
His oft-repeated mantra, “I have already done so well without pinning myself, why would I do that?” underscores his claim of having achieved his remarkable physique without the aid of steroids.
This claim, however, has been met with skepticism and has led to numerous accusations, notably from Greg Doucette.
Hands down the top-rated testosterone booster supplement for men who want faster muscle growth.
Known for his brutally honest takes, Greg Doucette, another prominent figure in the fitness world, has publicly accused Eubank of using Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMS) and steroids.
Doucette’s accusations stem from his belief that Eubank’s physique, while not impossible to attain naturally, is highly unlikely without some form of assistance.
Legal muscle-building supplement that's designed to mimic the effects of dianabol without all side effects.
These accusations have been fueled by Eubank’s own promotion of SARMS in a video.
While he did not directly admit to using them, his promotion of these substances, which are widely known to aid in muscle build-up and fat loss, has led to increased speculation about his natural status.
Despite the accusations, Eubank has remained steadfast in his denial of steroid use. However, the allegations and his own promotion of SARMS continue to cast a shadow of doubt over his claims.
The following sections will delve deeper into this controversy, providing a more in-depth analysis of the evidence and expert opinions on the matter.
Exploring the SARMS Controversy
Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators, or SARMS, have been at the center of the controversy surrounding Alex Eubank’s ‘natty’ status.
SARMS are a type of therapeutic compound, designed to have similar effects to anabolic steroids, but with fewer side effects.
They target the androgen receptors in the body, influencing the body to grow muscle, reduce fat, and increase bone density.
Eubank drew public attention when he posted a video promoting SARMS, sparking speculation about his natural status.
In the video, he discusses the advantages of SARMS, their effects on muscle growth, and fat loss. However, he stops short of admitting to using them himself.
The ambiguity in Eubank’s words has sparked intense debate among his followers and within the fitness community.
Some argue that his knowledge and promotion of SARMS suggest personal use, while others maintain that discussing a subject does not necessarily imply participation.
The SARMS video controversy adds a layer of complexity to the debate around Alex Eubank’s ‘natty’ status.
While not conclusive proof of steroid use, the video has undoubtedly fueled the speculation surrounding his physique, and it’s one more piece of the puzzle in determining whether Eubank is truly a natural athlete or not.
Comparative Analysis: Alex Eubank vs. Other Fitness Influencers
In order to gain further insight into the question of Alex Eubank’s ‘natty’ status, it’s helpful to compare him to other notable fitness influencers who also claim to be natural bodybuilders.
It’s important to note, however, that every individual’s physique is unique and influenced by a variety of factors, including genetics and lifestyle.
A popular figure that comes to mind is Jeff Nippard, a Canadian bodybuilder and fitness influencer.
Nippard stands at 5 feet 5 inches, with a reported weight of 165 lbs. Nippard has consistently maintained a lean figure over the years, and like Eubank, also asserts he is a natural athlete.
His proclamations have been met with lesser skepticism, possibly due to his smaller stature and a more attainable body size.
Another comparison could be made with Chris Elkins, another self-proclaimed natural bodybuilder.
Elkins, who stands at 5 feet 7 inches and weighs around 155 lbs, is known for his lean physique and strength.
His physique seems more in line with what is generally accepted as achievable naturally, and his claims have been met with far less controversy than Eubank’s.
These comparisons help to illustrate some of the skepticism around Eubank’s claims of natural bodybuilding.
Eubank’s physique, while extraordinary and awe-inspiring, is noticeably more muscular and leaner than other fitness influencers claiming natural status.
This stark difference, coupled with Eubank’s promotion of SARMS, adds weight to the arguments questioning his ‘natty’ status.
While it’s not impossible for Eubank to be a genetic outlier, the combination of these factors continues to fuel speculation.
Expert Opinion on Alex Eubank’s Natural Status
When considering expert opinions on whether or not Alex Eubank is natural, the views are mixed.
According to some fitness experts, Eubank’s physique is at the high end of what might be attainable naturally, but not completely out of the realm of possibility.
Such experts point to genetic outliers who have achieved similarly impressive builds naturally, albeit rarely.
However, other experts express doubt over Eubank’s natural claims.
Pointing to his muscular development and extremely low body fat percentage, these experts argue that these physical features are typically only achievable through the use of performance-enhancing drugs.
They further assert that the continuous maintenance of such a physique is particularly challenging without external aid.
The SARMS promotion video adds a further layer of complexity to expert opinions.
While some believe that discussing a subject doesn’t necessarily mean involvement, others argue that promoting substances associated with muscle growth and fat loss indicates probable use.
In conclusion, while there is no definitive verdict from the expert community, the consensus leans towards skepticism regarding Alex Eubank’s claims of being natural.
The combination of his extraordinary physique, promotion of SARMS, and the difficulty of maintaining such a physique naturally lends itself to doubt, fuelling ongoing debates about his ‘natty’ status.
5 Reasons Alex Eubank could be Natural
- Genetic Outliers: Some individuals are simply blessed with extraordinary genetics, allowing them to develop impressive muscular physiques naturally. Eubank may be one of these rare genetic outliers.
- Consistency of Training: Eubank’s consistent and intense workout regimen is well-documented. It is possible that his physique is a result of years of proper training and dedication.
- Diet: Eubank often shares his high-protein and nutrient-rich diet. A strict and balanced diet can significantly impact muscle growth and fat loss.
- Lack of Side Effects: Eubank doesn’t exhibit the usual side effects associated with steroid use such as excessive body hair, acne, or an enlarged jaw.
- Strong Denial: Eubank has consistently denied any steroid use, asserting that his physique is the result of hard work and discipline.
5 Reasons Alex Eubank may not be Natural
- Exceptional Physique: Eubank’s physique is exceptionally muscular and lean, surpassing what is generally considered achievable naturally.
- Promotion of SARMS: His promotion of SARMS, substances that mimic the effects of anabolic steroids, is suspect.
- Comparison to Other Fitness Influencers: Compared to other fitness influencers who claim to be natural, Eubank’s physique stands out as more muscular and lean, raising doubts.
- Professional Opinion: Many fitness experts believe that achieving and maintaining Eubank’s physique naturally is highly unlikely.
- Accusations by Peers: High-profile figures in the fitness industry, such as Greg Doucette, have accused Eubank of steroid use, further fueling speculation.
Conclusion
The debate around Alex Eubank’s natural status is complex, with persuasive arguments on both sides.
His impressive physique, while inspiring, surpasses what is typically attainable through natural means, prompting skepticism.
His promotion of SARMS, though not an outright admission of use, further adds to the doubt. Yet, there are compelling reasons to consider his claim of being natural, including the possibility of being a genetic outlier, his rigorous training regimen, and a strict diet.
Ultimately, without conclusive proof, the question “Is Alex Eubank natural?” remains a topic of speculation and debate within the fitness industry.
The controversy underlines the broader issues surrounding transparency and honesty in fitness influencing and the complexities of distinguishing the natural from the enhanced in a space where aesthetics are paramount.
